However, there are also functions of the company that have bad ethics as they have factories in Third world countries which have child labour who are working for 60 pence a day and the factories have very bad working conditions this has been backed up by the Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh as if it had good working conditions it would have not collapsed. This shows that Primark do not care about the welfare of their workers and will not improve their working conditions as it will increase the costs of the business meaning their profit margin will narrow and may mean that they will have to increase the prices of their clothing in order to cover the costs which may displease customers making them become unloyal and shop at a rival which will lead to the revenue and profit of Primark decreasing. However, to improve their ethics they should use their generated profit to improve the factory's working condition and the workers welfare e.g. increased pay which also has the opportunity of increasing the profit of the company as good ethics will act as a unique selling point which will attract more customers to the Primark stores leading to increased profit to cover the extra costs.
Overall, I believe Primark is a company that has bad ethics, this is due to their mistreatment of child labour and their workers health and working conditions which shows they do not care about their employees unless they are not doing their job and Primark is not making the maximum potential profit they can. This backs up the statement that Primark has a bigger focus on making their maximum revenue and profit and getting and retaining a large base of loyal customers than on their ethical matters which displays that Primark is unethical.
No comments:
Post a Comment